Skip to Main Content

Monthly Archives: November 2009

11.27.09

Federalism and Health Reform

By Peter Jacobson

For academics, federalism (the enduring tension between the states and the federal government for primary in formulating and implementing policy) is an endlessly fascinating source of debate and the focal point for constitutional analysis. But federalism is far more than an academic or intellectual exercise. Which level of government takes responsibility for a given issue […]

Categories:
Thematic Areas:

11.24.09

Senate Bill’s Interstate Commerce Findings

By Mark Hall

Here is a link to the Senate’s health care bill.  Perusing some of its 2000 pages, I came across the following, SEC. 1501 (p. 320), which should put to rest any argument that an individual mandate exceeds Congress’ powers under the Commerce Clause: Congress makes the following findings: In GENERAL.—The individual responsibility requirement provided for in […]

Categories:
Thematic Areas:

11.23.09

The Confusing Insurance Categories in the Senate Bill

By Tim Jost

Another feature of the Senate bill that compares unfavorably with the House bill is its confusing definitions of insurance coverage. The House bill recognizes one category of private insurance, a “qualified health benefits plan,” which employers are obligated to provide and individuals to buy. This term is used throughout the bill. Only grandfathered plans are […]

Categories:
Thematic Areas:

11.17.09

ERISA Tort Preemption and HR 3962, Take Four

By Tim Jost

In recent days, Mark Hall, Richard Johnson, and Peter Jacobson have all offered opinions as to how HR 3962, if enacted, would affect ERISA preemption of state tort claims against insurers. Let me offer a fourth opinion. First, remember that ERISA tort liability preemption is based primarily on section 502 of ERISA (29 USC 1132). […]

Categories:
Thematic Areas:

11.17.09

Reform’s Hidden Hazards? An Interview with Karen Pollitz

By Lester Feder

Karen Pollitz is a research professor at the Georgetown University Health Policy Institute. The O’Neill Institute’s Lester Feder spoke with her on November 16 about potential loopholes in reform legislation. Lester Feder: I want to start by asking what you think of the reform proposals that have emerged. Karen Pollitz: I think we’ve got a […]

Categories:
Thematic Areas:

The views reflected in this expert column are those of the individual authors and do not necessarily represent those of the O’Neill Institute for National and Global Health Law or Georgetown University. This blog is solely informational in nature, and not intended as a substitute for competent legal advice from a licensed and retained attorney in your state or country.

See the full disclaimer and terms of use.