Food and Drug Law Journal   |  June 9, 2017

Read the Publication

In 2012, a federal court of appeals struck down an FDA rule requiring graphic health warnings on cigarettes as violating First Amendment commercial speech protections. Tobacco product inserts and onserts can more readily avoid First Amendment constraints while delivering more extensive information to tobacco users, and can work effectively to support and encourage smoking cessation. This paper examines FDA’s authority to require effective inserts and onserts and shows how FDA could design and support them to avoid First Amendment problems. Through this process, the paper offers helpful insights regarding how key Tobacco Control Act provisions can and should be interpreted and applied to follow and promote the statute’s purposes and objectives. The paper’s rigorous analysis of existing First Amendment case law relating to compelled commercial speech also provides useful guidance for any government efforts either to compel product disclosures or to require government messaging in or on commercial products or their advertising, whether done for remedial, purely informational, or behavior modification purposes.

Read more here.

Latest publications See All

Journal Article

October 24, 2024

Alana Sharp Matthew M. Kavanagh Ndivhuwo Rambau, Soeurette Policar, Elise Lankiewicz, Allan Nsubuga, Luke Chimhanda, Anele Yawa, Kenneth Mwehonge, Donald Denis Tobaiwa, Gérald Marie Alfred, Asia Russell, Solange Baptiste, Onesmus Mlewa Kalama, Rodelyn M. Marte, Naïké Ledan, Brian Honermann, Krista Lauer, Nadia Rafif, Susan Perez, Gang Sun, Anna Grimsrud, Laurel Sprague, Keith Mienies