Food and Drug Law Journal   |  June 9, 2015

Read the Publication

There is a vigorous discussion in the public health community over how to regulate e-cigarettes and their marketing. Based on the fact that e-cigarette use directly mimics smoking but is less harmful to users and nonusers, some public health experts favor a soft approach. They do not want regulation to interfere with the potential of e-cigarettes to help smokers quit or to help smokers switch to a harm-reducing way to consume nicotine, and want to err on the side of being more permissive. Other public health experts favor a harder approach. They point to the fact that e-cigarette use is addictive and, at a minimum, still produces significant harms and risks compared to no tobacco or nicotine use at all. They also raise concerns that e-cigarette marketing can prompt some smokers to switch to e-cigarettes or to dual use instead of quitting all tobacco or nicotine use; increase relapse into nicotine addiction among former smokers; and increase youth and adult initiation into nicotine addiction, which could serve as a gateway into addicted smoking. They want a more strict approach, at least until more is known about e-cigarette harms and their impact on initiation, cessation and other use trends.

Read more here.

Latest publications See All

Report

October 14, 2025

Charles Holmes Maggie Little, Ph.D.; Heidi Weimer, J.D., MPH, LL.M; Dylan Green, MPH; Alicia Patterson, Ph.D.; Jonathan Healey; Sydney Luken; Janet Tatenda Bhila; Aleny Couto, MD; Shona Dalal, PhD; Will Fleisher, PhD; Jen Gennai; Rayid Ghani; Peter Godfrey-Faussett; Melissa Goldstein, JD; Kathy Hageman, PhD, MPH; Nina Hasen, PhD; Micheal Ighodaro; Thoko Kalua, MBBS, MSc; Jennifer Miller, PhD; Yogan Pillay, PhD; Anton Pozniak, MD; Miriam Rabkin, MD, MPH; David Ribes, PhD; Lisa Singh, PhD